There’s been a lot of discussion lately about the end of the destination web.
I think we are a long way off of the “end”, and brand websites and microsites will still have a key role in most marketing plans for some time to come. After all, millions of people are still visiting these sites.
However there is a definite trend away from destination websites that has major implications for brands and agencies.
As an exercise, pick any of the top 100 brands from the Millward Brown or Interbrand list. Then go to Google Website Trends and enter that brand’s URL (i.e. bmw.com), selecting “websites” above the resulting graph to get unique visitors.
For each brand you should find that visitors between 2007 and 2009 are trending down, or flat at best.
If you look at Quantcast, which gives data going back to 2006, the decline is even steeper.
Here’s a set of examples across a diverse group of industries and audiences to help illustrate the point.
Disney.com
Quiksilver.com
Dell.com
ESPN.com
Nintendo.com
Sony.com
Comedycentral.com
Where are the people going?
At first, this doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense. More and more people are spending more time online. So where is all that time going?
Here’s a big clue from the new 800 pound gorilla on the scene:
And it’s not just Facebook…
Tumblr
Vimeo
Total time spent on Facebook is up 700% year over year. For Twitter it’s 3200%. Live Journal 273%.
Subscribe to *supercollider for original research and insight goodness
Don’t forget the rise of RSS feeds and other “off-site” content distribution.
Why go to a site when the site can come to you? The BBC have been utilising a goal that no more than 30% of total viewership should be site based - the rest should be accessed off site, including YouTube, RSS, Social Networking, etc.
Yup good point Con. And widgets still aren’t nearly as big as they will be, eventually.
Love the BBC stat, that says it all right there. They are the largest broadcaster in the world, and instead of trying to pull you to their “channel”, they are looking to get their content out by as many means as possible.
Obviously the difference between them and competitors like say NBC is that BBC is public rather than commercial entity, however in that respect they are similar to most brands who are trying to get content out by any means necessary, rather than trying to pull towards walled gardens (or destination sites).
Nice article. I guess YouTube can be added to the 2e list too. I think websites will have the function to show were you can get the content elsewhere on the web
Love the post, nothing like clear compelling charts to make an argument. Brand websites can have a role acting as a guide to where to find this distributed content as Rene says, but also to helpfully aggregate it, curate it, and enhance it. Tools like Netvibes and Friend Feed and conventions like the hashtag are making the aggregation element increasingly easy.
interesting collection fo data! Using most of the sites on the second list and having content coming to my own “startpage” via netvibes I do agree: brands need a strategy to enable free content moving to sites where users are due to sticky things like their social graph, instead of expecting users to visit stale brand presences…
by the way, i just noticed, that you got the titles of the last couple of diagrams wrong - it says “Vimeo” above the graph for hulu.com, for example.